If you’re evaluating Buildertrend but want better job-costing, budget vs actuals, forecasting and an easy rollout for a small-to-mid-sized contractor, here are the strongest alternatives — and why Planyard leads the pack.
Why Contractors Look Beyond Buildertrend
Buildertrend is excellent for US-style residential builders who need schedules, selections, client portals and change tracking in one place. But many contractors and developers (especially in the UK, Ireland and Europe) end up needing things Buildertrend only covers partially or via exports:
- Job budget reports are there, but not full-blown CVR, applications for payment, retentions and cost-to-complete forecasting the way QS teams expect. That’s exactly what’s highlighted on the official comparison page: Buildertrend vs Planyard.
- Residential-oriented workflows don’t always match UK commercial practice, so teams fall back to spreadsheets to get valuations, retentions and EAC right.
- You still have to keep accounting happy. Many teams want a flow where project people control costs, and only approved, coded invoices are pushed to the ledger — the way Planyard does with its Xero construction integration and QuickBooks contractors integration.
- Some want transparent pricing and a rollout in days, not a big re-training exercise.
So the “alternative” you pick depends on what you felt Buildertrend was light on: commercial control, UK/EU specifics, or breadth of construction features.
What to Look for in a Buildertrend Alternative (Financial Focus)
If the gap was “we can’t run proper commercial numbers in Buildertrend,” then prioritise:
- Live budget vs actuals tied to commitments/POs/subcontractor bills so the project team, not only accounting, sees the truth.
- Variations / change orders that update the budget automatically.
- Valuations / progress claims and retentions for UK/IE-style month-end.
- Cost-to-complete / forecasting (EAC) built-in — which is exactly what Planyard points out Buildertrend doesn’t do natively in the same way.
- Accounting integrations that only post approved, coded costs to Xero/QuickBooks/Sage, not everything raw.
- Fast rollout so you can pilot with a live job in under a week.
That’s basically the Buildertrend-vs-Planyard story, just applied to a wider set of tools.
Quick Comparison Grid – Top Buildertrend Alternatives
| Tool | Primary strength | Financial / commercial depth | Residential / client portals | Best for | Time to adopt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planyard | Financial-first cost control, CVR, valuations |  Very high – budgets, variations, valuations, retentions, forecasting, accounting sync |  Not a homeowner-portal tool (can sit beside one) | Contractors and developers who need QS-grade control next to Xero/QuickBooks | Days to 1 week |
| Procore | Broad construction platform | High – strong financial modules but broader and heavier | Not residential-first like Buildertrend | Firms that outgrew residential tools and want a full suite | Weeks |
| Archdesk | ERP-like construction suite | High – commercial, procurement and finance in one | Less focused on client selections/portals | Mid-sized teams that want to standardise operations | Weeks |
| Buildern | Project + financials in one workspace | High – detailed budgeting, POs, progress payments | Client-facing features not the main point | Design & build, developers, mixed portfolios | Weeks |
| Fieldwire | Site/drawings/task coordination | Low – financials not the focus | No residential portal focus | Teams that only needed better site control and will pair it with finance | Days |
Deep Dive: Key Alternatives (UK & International)
1. Planyard
Overview
Planyard is the closest like-for-like fix for the exact gaps the Buildertrend comparison calls out: it was built for project-side cost control — budgets, commitments/POs, subcontractor billing, variations, valuations/applications, retentions and live CVR — and then built to push only approved documents to accounting.
Financial / Cost-Control Fit
- Live budget vs actuals tied to packages and POs
- Built-in cost-to-complete / forecasting
- Valuations / progress claims and retentions
- Approval flows before anything hits the ledger
- Native integrations for Xero and QuickBooks
Who It’s Best For
Main contractors, housebuilders and developers who need commercial clarity every month and who already run Xero/QuickBooks/Sage.
When to Consider Planyard Instead
If your main complaint about Buildertrend was “we still ended up in spreadsheets to do proper QS work,” Planyard is the tool that removes the spreadsheet. It’s the same story as Procore-vs-Planyard, just applied to Buildertrend.
Link to detailed comparison
See full comparison: Buildertrend vs Planyard →
2. Procore
Overview
Procore is the broad construction platform: documents, field, financials, collaboration. Compared to Buildertrend, it’s less “homeowner experience” and more “construction operations at scale.”
Financial / Cost-Control Fit
Procore has strong financial modules, but they’re heavier to configure than Planyard and typically rolled out as part of a bigger platform project. If you liked the idea of “one system” with Buildertrend but you’re now doing bigger commercial jobs, Procore is a natural step up.
Who It’s Best For
Contractors that are outgrowing residential workflows and want to unify field + financials in one tool.
When to Consider Planyard Instead
If the goal is just to get bulletproof budgets, valuations, retentions and forecasting running next to Xero/QuickBooks, then Planyard is the lighter, faster way to do that.
Link to detailed comparison
See full comparison: Procore vs Planyard →
3. Archdesk
Overview
Archdesk is an ERP-style construction system covering estimating, procurement, project management and finance in one.
Financial / Cost-Control Fit
Archdesk can match commercial needs well — forecasting, procurement against budgets, portfolio oversight. The trade-off is the usual ERP trade-off: more breadth = longer setup.
Who It’s Best For
Mid-sized firms that want to standardise many departments at once, not just replace Buildertrend’s lighter financials.
When to Consider Planyard Instead
If your near-term goal is to roll out UK-style commercial controls (valuations, retentions, variations, CVR) quickly, Planyard’s narrower scope and native accounting sync will be faster to bed in than a full ERP.
Link to detailed comparison
See full comparison: Archdesk vs Planyard →
4. Buildern
Overview
Buildern brings project management and financial control into one workspace and suits contractors who want detailed budgets, POs, progress payments and variations in the same tool.
Financial / Cost-Control Fit
It’s closer to commercial practice than Buildertrend for mixed or larger projects. Because it’s broader (estimating, scheduling, documents), rollout tends to be longer.
Who It’s Best For
Design-and-build contractors and developers who want an all-in-one but with stronger cost tracking than classic residential systems.
When to Consider Planyard Instead
If the real problem is month-end CVR, approvals and accounting cleanliness, Planyard will get you there faster and with native links to Xero and QuickBooks.
Link to detailed comparison
See full comparison: Buildern vs Planyard →
5. Fieldwire
Overview
Fieldwire vs Planyard on Planyard’s site makes it clear: Fieldwire is for drawings, tasks, punch lists and site collaboration, not for commercial management.
Financial / Cost-Control Fit
Financial depth is intentionally low. If you reached for Buildertrend mainly to get site coordination and comms, Fieldwire can replace that — you just won’t get budget, valuations, retentions or CVR inside it.
Who It’s Best For
Specialist contractors and site teams who want robust mobile coordination, and who are happy to run financial control in a second tool.
When to Consider Planyard Instead
If your pain is financial (late visibility on costs, manual valuations, messy data in accounting), then Planyard is the better centre of gravity.
Link to detailed comparison
See full comparison: Planyard vs Fieldwire →
Why Planyard Is the Best Fit for Financial-Control Teams Leaving Buildertrend
- It directly adds what Buildertrend is lighter on: CVR, forecasting, valuations, retentions.
- It was built to send only approved, coded invoices to accounting — which keeps Xero/QuickBooks clean. See: Xero construction integration and QuickBooks contractors integration.
- It rolls out in days, which matches the “we don’t want a huge platform project” expectation.
- Pricing is transparent and per-user, matching how smaller contractors prefer to buy.
So if Buildertrend got you organised but not commercially bulletproof, Planyard is the surgical upgrade.
Migration / Switching from Buildertrend
- Export current budgets, cost codes, suppliers/subcontractors from Buildertrend or your spreadsheets.
- Decide scope: only commercial/cost-control in the new tool, or wider project features too.
- Import to Planyard and map to your accounting structure.
- Connect Xero or QuickBooks.
- Pilot on one live project to prove valuations, approvals and CVR.
- Roll out to other projects.
Because Planyard is financial-first (like it says on all its compare pages), this can usually be done in days.
Next Steps
- Start a 14-day trial to see live budgets, approvals and invoice syncing.
- Or book a 30-minute demo to map Buildertrend workflows to Planyard’s financial flow.